Painting 'Allegory on Tulipmania' by Jan Brueghel the ...

How to trade Bitcoin Future

How to trade Bitcoin Future


https://preview.redd.it/zel9pxcl8df51.jpg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=21c74d0ccc5556ea744088a283c44819fba59aef



Bitcoin is troublesome to use.
But bitcoin’s isue may build it additional valuable.
So, what’ reality regarding bitcoin’s future?
Bitcoin mining may be a senseless waste of energy.
As bitcoin hits mainstream media, the subject of bitcoin mining
bubble regarding to pop.For ten years, the media has enjoyed painting bitcoin as a bubble concerning to pop. They’ve gleefully pronounced the bubble popped and bitcoin dead … over 350 times. However the reality regarding bitcoin is that it keeps coming back back. Why?

Charlie Munger called bitcoin “worthless artificial gold.” Others in the media have likened bitcoin to a bubble, a “tulip mania,” and different strong statements
Each time bitcoin improves itself (like with Segwit
Segregated Witnesses. A protocol implemented by Bitcoin to extend transaction speed. SegWit allows a lot of transactions to be written into a single block on a blockchain.

or the Lightning Network), or will increase in value, the media is keen and ready to jump on it, decrying and denouncing it.
Therefore what’s the reality behind bitcoin’s price -- is it extremely a bubble?
The reality regarding bitcoin is straightforward; it's experiencing the same rise and fall cycles as each new technology and asset catego
The web also experienced a bubble. Shares of dotcom firms rose by a thousandpercent on a daily basis. Then it all tumbled down. However we have a tendency to’re still using the web, aren’t we have a tendency to? More than ever, in fact.

Stocks conjointly experienced big boom and bust cycles, especially in their early days.

We might feel like stocks have been around forever -- and to us they need. However stocks conjointly had a starting, and a rough one too. Once upon a time in 1531, when the first stocks were invented, they saw extraordinary volatility, scams, and no regulation. In fact, before stock exchanges, they were sold at occasional shops -- just like cryptocurrencies were sold on la peer to peer

marketplace, before exchanges came online.
Even property, viewed by the majority as “the safest investment” experienced a dramatic cycle. Business Insider reported that “Between 2006 and 2014, nearly ten million homeowners in America saw the foreclosure sale of their own homes.” And tens of thousands became homeless as a result of of it. Nevertheless --- we have a tendency to’re still living in homes, aren’t we?

The future of bitcoin would possibly be the identical as that of stocks, bonds, assets, and the web. It rises and falls like all the others, and it is currently terribly volatile -- but that’s as a result of it’s young.

Stocks have been around for 400 years. Dotcom corporations for forty years. Bitcoin is solely 10 years previous -- and cryptocurrencies, normally, are even younger. But slowly, they will become a part of our daily lives.

Rich investors are manipulating costs!
Look at this headline from the Independent: “Bitcoin price Crash: 'Manipulative Whales

Whale
A very wealthy individual capable of creating massive trades.
View full glossary
' cause Cryptocurrency Market Meltdown!”
It’s sensationalism, pure and straightforward. The article goes on to rant against these therefore-known as “whales” -- individuals who own voluminous dollars of BTC -- as evil-doers who’s solely thought is profit.

This type of sensationalism is meant to harm Bitcoin’s future; to scare people faraway from doing research and thinking for themselves.

Nonetheless, this statement is somewhat true. Up to eighty five% of Bitcoin’s supply is solely owned by onepercent of wallet addresses.




But there’s an important point to be made about these numbers. Most of the prime percentage of wallets is not owned by whales -- but by exchanges

Exchange
On-line platforms on which people can buy and sell cryptocurrencies.
View full glossary
.
However their result is getting smaller and smaller.
A company referred to as Chainalysis -- that makes a speciality of analyzing the Bitcoin blockchain

-- found that “the actual threat that all whales pose to the cryptocurrency economy is relatively low. If they sold off their entire holdings, it'd be effectively a $3.9 billion sale at current costs. That’s not even tenpercent of this total market capitalization of Bitcoin.”
This is as a result of, as I hinted above, several of those wallets holding such vast sums are the ‘cold wallets

’ (wallets held offline) belonging to major exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, Binance, and more. These wallets cannot be used to manipulate the price, diminishing the potential impact of enormous ‘whales’ selling their positions.
Bitcoin is simply too slow for use as a currency.
The reality regarding Bitcoin is that yes, it's slower than VISA, Mastercard, and alternative centralized electronic payment systems.

Paying together with your credit cards takes seconds and the network can handle payments around the globe twenty fouseven. But, though Bitcoin can additionally be used around the world, confirmation

of payment takes an average of 10 minutes; during the bitcoin craze recently 2017, confirmation times might take hours.
Moreover, VISA on average processes around 2,00zero transactions per second (tps). This means the amount of payments individuals make per second on the network. VISA includes a maximum of twenty four,00zero TPS. Bitcoin, by distinction, has a maximum of ten TPS. This argument has been place forward by several critics over the years and picked up by the media as the doom of bitcoin’s future.

However Bitcoin could be a technology that evolves.
Now let’s assume regarding Bitcoin’s past for a moment. The coin and its underlying technology -- the blockchain -- are only ten years previous. When the web was ten years old -- the year was 1989. Do you keep in mind the net in 1989? I sure do.



payments in exchange for not revealing sensitive info. So, in bound ways that, BTC and cryptocurrencies offer hackers a lot of options.
However money continues to be king for every criminality.
Though it’s true that hackers and phishers do typically ask for payment in BTC

There’s an aphorism: “money talks.” It means that that if you would like to get something done -- the best argument you can build is to place down a stack of money. When Bitcoin rose to fame, the primary headlines focused around Bitcoin being the prime choice for criminality.

But Lilita Infante, Special Agent for the DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) has some contradictory info regarding this. She was one among a ten-person Cyber Investigative Task Force team whose primary aim was the dark web and crypto-related investigations. This cluster is no little force. They collaborate with the Department of Justice, FBI, and also the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. And she went on the record to talk regarding what share of bitcoin transactions are literally being employed for illegal things; she said that “illegal activity has shrunk to about 10 p.c.”

Only tenp.c of all the transactions on the Bitcoin network could be used for illegal things. Which number is falling.

The fall in Bitcoin’s use among criminals is due to several factors. The most prominent factor is that Bitcoin is no longer anonymous. Sciencemag wrote a full report on how governments are developing and using techniques to explore the Bitcoin blockchain and notice criminals by tracing their bitcoin payments.

Paying with bitcoin isn’t simple.
I’ve heard this argument flow into widely throughout the years. I still hear it from my grandpa each vacation dinner. He didn’t see a Bitcoin checkout option at the grocery when he bought the turkey -- therefore it’ll never be used.



Perhaps Bitcoin is on its means to being such a store of worth. For 10 years now bitcoin has been ready to be saved and retrieved and exchanged -- and it’s worth has only gone up (bumpy but up).

Need to get more cryptocurrencies? Check out our top 5 cryptocurrencies to shop for, whether you’re a beginner or an experienced investor!

Bitcoin is difficult to use.
Bitcoin, like all new technologies, isn't the most user-friendly.

You would like to line up a wallet, bear in mind a seed phrase, and several additional steps. Sending and receiving BTC

payments additionally involves steps of copy/pasting long strings of random letters and numbers. It’s powerful, I hear ya.


I additionally keep in mind all the steps I needed to require to send emails back when those were new. Insert a CD from AOL into my computer. Install AOL. Unplug my phone line. Plug in my Modem. Wait for it to make all those noises and finally connect. Then set up my AOL email and password. It was quite the method.

My grandfather never thought emails would come out and even my mother said folks would perpetually like handwriting letters (and using a physical dictionary for spell check!) and sending through the post.


Think about it the approach we tend to assume about gold. Not everyone has gold. It’s also a bit difficult to own.

If you wish to own gold for its ‘store of price’ properties, you wish to seek out a specialized look to buy investment gold. You need to store it somewhere, sort of a personal safe or a bank vault, and bear in mind the password. This is somewhat troublesome.

https://preview.redd.it/k0x3jqsm8df51.jpg?width=770&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ff7c2f29881c28fb22c9828c497cc1981eea2919
Perhaps Bitcoin’s problem will facilitate it retain its value, just like gold
You Might Conjointly Like: The 5 est Bitcoin Sports Betting Sites
https://www.cryptoerapro.com/bitcoin-future/
submitted by cryptoerapro to u/cryptoerapro [link] [comments]

What's Driving the Bitcoin Revolution: Why $100 worth of Bitcoin is worth more than 100 US Dollars

Those skeptical of bitcoin have a tendency to view it as analogous to certain historical currency manias. Just about every commodity you can think of has been used as money at some point, famously including the giant stone money of Yap island, and Dutch tulipomania.
Tulipomania created economic-history's most famous case of a speculative bubble that went sour. Many, including my own brother, continue to paint bitcoin with the tulip-moniker. A speculative bubble occurs when an asset's price deviates from its intrinsic value.
But because bitcoin is not a stock or a company, people seem to have trouble realizing why bitcoin should have any value at all, and that's what I want to focus on.
The stunning fact is that $100 worth of bitcoin (0.699 BTC as of this writing) is worth more than $100 in any other fiat currency in the world. One way we know this is that people continue to pay fees between 1% - 4% to purchase bitcoin with fiat currencies. Thus, people would rather have $96 - $99 worth of bitcoin than $100 of fiat currency.
The underlying reasons for this are bitcoin's killer features:
This is the economic case for bitcoin, that because bitcoin transactions are irreversible and can be conducted at the cost of pennies, or even for free (if time is no object), regardless of the value being transferred, the result is that retailers find bitcoin extremely attractive--they can improve their profits by nearly the same percentage that they no longer pay Visa/MC/PayPal for payment processing and transaction insurance.
I recently had someone argue that they didn't consider this a killer feature because they believed that Visa could simply lower their transaction fees to remain competitive. This person simply didn't get it. When Visa charges you ~$200 on a $10,000 transaction and a typical bitcoin transaction for the same amount costs $0.13 cents, there's not much room for Visa to lower fees and remain profitable, unless they want to fire 99% of their workforce, sell off every single one of their commercial properties, and abandon fraud protection and a hundred other things they do to remain profitable. Bitcoin defeats the credit card companies on a structural basis which constitutes a classic case of market disruption for which the companies being disrupted have no effective defense.
Because of bitcoin's lower transaction costs, both buyer and retailer should receive and offer better deals of existing goods. At first, retailers will keep prices the same in dollar terms, just price them in bitcoin, and enjoy a significant profit advantage, which their competitors will have to replicate to compete, creating a virtuous cycle of bitcoin adoption among retailers.
But, as retailers in general complete this adoption cycle and begin competing on a bitcoin-basis, they will lower their prices in bitcoin to reflect the lower transaction costs and consumers will begin to benefit directly.
The value of bitcoin to humanity is directly tied to this feature of lower transaction costs which improves the marginal profitability of every single transaction it's used in, meaning in the end lower prices for consumers and raising everyone's standard of living.
That's why bitcoin deserves a market cap of many trillions of dollars, because it has inherent financial advantages in its use, and everyone in the world could profit by using it, making everyone's lives better.
We live in an age where governments believe they have a right to take whatever amount of wages from you that they decide is fair, and to ban the ownership of drugs and weapons they (foolishly) decide they don't want you to own. Bitcoin offers an easy way to circumvent government payment-snooping and ethical gray-markets like Silk Road.
But even if you, like me, have no interest in gray-market transactions, you can take financial privacy that your bank will not give you. By law banks must inform on you to the government, and chances are your purchases are crawled by government computers every single day.
With bitcoin you can conduct as anonymous a transaction as currently possible, connecting to retailers via the TOR network, keeping wallets no one knows you own, etc., etc. Privacy in the bitcoin ecosystem is a topic worth of study to itself.
What I still remember to this day are the words of certain German anarchs I'd met once whom refused to show their face in public anymore or give out their real name--they believe that privacy needed to be taken by each person, not merely expected of other people to give to them.
Perhaps bitcoin's more controversial feature is the expectation of continual deflation over time. Many don't understand how or why this works or what effect it would have on an economy, and some (Keynesians) even think it would harm an economy. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Bitcoin will grow in value as more people begin to demand it as they learn of it. Some have accused bitcoin therefore of being little more than a speculative tulip-bubble. Frankly I would agree with them if it weren't for the fact of lower transaction costs. But it's also true that even without having the lowest transaction costs, bitcoin would probably still be able to survive as a currency in its own right simply from its deflationary policy.
Even after everyone on earth knows about and even uses bitcoin, it would continue to deflate and gain in price as workers became more productive overall, generating more wealth, demanding more goods, and as the population of the planet grows so too will the value of bitcoin.
This makes it good to hold bitcoin for future purposes, which encourages savings, which means people have bitcoin to invest when a really good opportunity comes around, which is how the modern world was built.
Economies become rich the same way people do: by producing more than they consume (and saving it). All the people who say it's good to get rich by borrowing rather than saving ignore that without the savers there would be no one to borrow from.
We are living in a period of historic value-gain that will not often be repeated, and by the time bitcoin's market cap reaches $100 billion would never occur again, so the people who worry about continual volatility should not worry. When bitcoin becomes the native unit of account, volatility (as measured in other currencies) becomes a non-issue.
Much has been made of bitcoin's vulnerability to hackers and the like. But what of the risk of politicians hyperinflating a currency and destroying its value thereby, such as has happened in so many countries around the world.
Bitcoin was founded with the idea of ending the necessity for 3rd party trust in a currency. There's no bitcoin central bank, no equivalent of Bernanke setting fiscal policy, no government controlling supply of bitcoin or abusing it to pump the market on an election year.
Bitcoin replaces the existential risk of a fiat currency with the existential risk of a hacker, or of trusting the robustness of the bitcoin program.
Of the two scenarios, I think it better to risk facing the hacker, because there are very good steps a person can take to be quite sure that a hacker cannot take their bitcoin, and with the advent of hardware wallets this won't even be a big concern anymore.
And as for the robustness of the bitcoin program itself, trust in that can only build with time and use. I think the price increases starting in January are in part a reflection of growing confidence in bitcoin, that it had passed the first big test, the June '11 crash, that the block reward halving experience had proved that mining would continue despite the halving, and the recent blockchain fork showed how the network responds to an emergency bug. Now all we need is someone to attempt a 51% attack and find themselves almost immediately defeated and the stress test will be complete :P
So when you tell someone about bitcoin, when you tell them about the massive uptake in users and the resulting price increase as a result of growing demand, they will imagine it a bubble, but remember to tell them the fact of lower transaction costs. It is the heart of bitcoin adoption.
People want bitcoin because $100 worth of bitcoin is actually worth at least $135 (if you factor in future expected value increases via deflation and discount it to present value, and existing and expected inflation in fiat currencies, and lower overall transaction costs generally which make things cheaper to buy in bitcoin than in dollars). That figure could vary significantly from person to person depending on how fast they think bitcoin adoption will take place (if they do at all), how much they value personal privacy, etc., but this is why people are going to continue to prefer bitcoin over fiat, and move into it slowly but surely.
If this is not a bubble, then it is the world waking up to the true valuation of bitcoin and slowly realizing that this idea is set to change the world.
We live in a historic epoch, and finance will never be the same again.
submitted by Anenome5 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

“Bitcoin a Market for Miscreants & Millennials” Says ‘Commodities King’ Gartman

Hedge fund legend and billionaire investor Mike Novogratz may have viewed last week’s bitcoin price decline as an opportunity to purchase $15 million to $20 million worth of BTC at a discount, but market forecaster Dennis Gartman maintains that there “is no value” in the nascent cryptocurrency. Gartman, who has been nicknamed the “commodities king”, told CNBC’s “Fast Money” that while he believes blockchain technology, which Curriculum Vitae blockchain is based on, “has merit” and is “going to change the manner in which we trade…and invest,” he does have any desire to enter the cryptocurrency, like CVH coin, ecosystem as an investor or trader. “This is a market … for criminals, this is a market for millennials,” Gartman said on Monday. “This is a market for pure punters, but there is no value here whatsoever.” Parroting an oft-lobbed insult, Gartman argued that bitcoin’s rapid year-to-date price climb reminds him of Tulipmania in 17th-century Holland. “This reminds me so much of the tulip bulb mania in Holland, of other bubbles that we have seen and they always end badly,” he said. When pressed to explain his bearish stance, he argued that bitcoin’s price volatility inhibits its use as a currency. “How can you buy or sell a painting using bitcoin, when the change in volatility is 20-30-40 percent in the course of a week? It’s nonsense,” he said. It’s true that the bitcoin price remains highly volatile, but this line of argument does not consider that the bitcoin price will necessarily exhibit volatility as the global market determines its fair value. It also ignores the prevalence of payment processing services such as BitPay, which automatically convert cryptocurrency payments to local fiat currency at the point of sale to shield businesses from price volatility. These services also help companies use cryptocurrency to streamline supply chain payments across borders. Gartman’s skeptical stance on bitcoin is shared by many mainstream financiers, most notably the bombastic Jamie Dimon. However, this legion of critics is beginning to thin, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to claim that cryptocurrency only attracts criminals and young, presumably-inexperienced investors. Just this week, one of the world’s largest hedge funds — the U.K.-based Man Group — revealed that it is prepared to add bitcoin to its “investment universe” once bitcoin futures contracts launch on U.S. exchange CME in approximately one mon
submitted by Yililai to Bitcoin_News [link] [comments]

Is Bitcoin a Modern-Day Tulip Mania? Is Bitcoin the biggest bubble since the Dutch Tulip Mania? Bitcoin and Tulip Mania, The New World Reserve Currency. IS BITCOIN BUBBLE GOING TO ZERO OR NOT??? Bitcoin and the Tulip Bubble  MaiView  20190718

So much history surrounds this flower but I think this painting by Hans Bollongier still feels current today. Floral still life. Hans Bollongier, 1639 Credit: rijksmuseum.nl . Coincidentally, The New York Times, recently had an article highlighting the similarities between Tulip-mania and the digital currency Bitcoin . Bitcoin’s critics say the digital tokens are like the tulip bulbs of 17th ... Tulip mania - Wikipedia; Bitcoin bubble dwarfs tulip mania from 400 years ago, Elliott Wave a reportaround the same time on why bitcoin could soar to $20,000The Rothschild investment corporation has just purchased Bitcoin via the Bitcoin securities, the rate of which is formed in accordance with the bitcoin price. Tulip mania: the classic story of a Dutch financial bubble is mostly wrong. Bitcoin is being compared to tulips, but I researched tulip mania for years and found no evidence of mass bankruptcies ... The phenomenon tulip mania is still mentioned in the economics books and new economic air bubbles such as Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Allegory on Tulipmania. Brueghel made a great painting: ‘Allegory on Tulipmania’ about the phenomenon. On the painting you see a monkey pointing to flowering tulips. Another monkey is holding up a tulip and a moneybag. This is the way Breughel ... Ridler wanted to criticize speculative bubbles, and saw parallels between AI, tulip mania, and the cryptocurrency Bitcoin. She built an AI installation in which the price of one Bitcoin determines the growth of invented tulips in a video. The higher the price, the more stripes the tulips get, and an algorithm then turns them into flower still lifes.

[index] [16059] [244] [25513] [51378] [39939] [39223] [27502] [50354] [10146] [43541]

Is Bitcoin a Modern-Day Tulip Mania?

Forbes Media editor-in-chief Steve Forbes and Layfield Report CEO John Layfield discuss bitcoin, the somewhat-controversial but increasingly popular cryptocu... Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan chief executive, says the enthusiasm for bitcoin is worse than Dutch tulip mania in the 1600s. But is the comparison between the two fair? But is the comparison between the ... This video is unavailable. Watch Queue Queue. Watch Queue Queue Queue In today's episode, I am going to take a look at bitcoin compared to some previously famous bubbles like the tulip bubble and dot-com bubble to see if bitcoin has already bubbled and is heading to ... When a tulip bulb cost as much as a house: The Tulip Mania of 1637 - Duration: 12:25. The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered Recommended for you 12:25

#